<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Cloud in Private Cloud&#8217;s Clothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cloudpulseblog.com/2009/09/public-cloud-in-private-clouds-clothing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cloudpulseblog.com/2009/09/public-cloud-in-private-clouds-clothing</link>
	<description>Blogging to the Beat of Cloud Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:24:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Krish</title>
		<link>http://cloudpulseblog.com/2009/09/public-cloud-in-private-clouds-clothing/comment-page-1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Krish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloudpulseblog.com/?p=628#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Sam, I agree with you that &quot;tenancy&quot; should be part of the defining attribute for private clouds. You nailed it with a great example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, I agree with you that &#8220;tenancy&#8221; should be part of the defining attribute for private clouds. You nailed it with a great example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
